THE REAL ISSUES


It’s time for ALL candidates running for state or national office to declare

– without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion –

their position on the REAL issues!

 

The REAL issues are those that the overwhelming majority of our elected officials, almost all candidates for office, and most of all media refuse to openly and honestly confront and/or address and that openly undermine and seek to absolutely destroy transform the foundations of our Constitutional Republic. The programs, policies and actions listed are a disgusting stench in the nostrils of free and honest men and women, and a flagrant assault on the inalienable rights given to and guaranteed to us by our Constitution. This list of REAL issues, is by no means complete, nor is it in any particular order, but it will be added to as we move toward the 2022 elections.


  • School Choice: All Arizona parents should have the right to send their children to the school of their choice. And, 100% of parental school tax dollars should follow their children to the school that they choose. Will you, if elected to office, give all Arizona parents the right and freedom to choose?
  • The Power of the ‘BIG TECH’ Oligarchs: These monoliths (some of which were built on investment by our government), who are constantly defended as ‘private entities’, have been allowed to wield blatant and overwhelming monopolistic powers to subvert and negate the 1st Amendment to our Constitution. We are not holding our breath thinking that Elon Musk can/will fix this or be allowed to fix this. Will you, if elected to office, confront this affront to the citizens of our State and our Constitutional Republic and to our inalienable rights under our Constitution?
  • The Medical Industrial Complex: On January 17, 1961, then President Dwight D. Eisenhower warned the nation about the increasing influence and power of the military-industrial complex (MIC).  Eisenhower cautioned that the federal government’s collaboration with an alliance of military and industrial leaders was vulnerable to abuse of power, and counseled American citizens to be vigilant in monitoring the MIC. Some 60 years after Eisenhower’s warning, we now have the Medical Industrial Complex. Big Pharma has become the CDC, FDA, NIH, NIAID, AMA, the WHO and more. The corporatists and money of Big Pharma have effectively infiltrated our government and our health care complex and now direct policy, treatments, control the narrative, and declare that the only science is what they declare is science. Those who do not bow to the new MIC lose their licenses, their privileges to practice, and are, in effect, cancelled from their profession. Along with Big Tech and Big Media, Big Pharma has partnered with Big Government to peddle ‘fear porn’ and a virus tyranny; closing our small businesses, but allowing the big donor corporatist businesses to remain open; masking us and locking us down; approving and mandating a ‘vaccine’ that was not adequately tested per historic norms, but was instead dispensed under an ’emergency use authorization’ with Big Pharma totally free of all liability for adverse injury or death; shuting down and/or censuring any debate and/or free exchange of ideas that has enduringly been the fundamental doctrine of science in human advancement; repudiating and negating our religious beliefs thereby making our bodies, not our property and God’s temple, but the property and chattel of the State. Worse, the MIC wants to triple jab our children, with some states wanting to do this without our – the parents – permission, when the risks grossly and clearly outweigh the benefits! Will you, if elected to office, confront this affront to the citizens of our State and our Constitutional Republic and to our inalienable rights under our Constitution?
  • Our OPEN Southern Border: Our state and nation is being invaded… What’s worse, is that the ruling regime – along with the Uniparty, for that matter – has extended what is an open invitation to the world to join the ranks of the invaders. Nuff said… Will you, if elected to office, confront this affront to the citizens of our State and our Constitutional Republic and to our inalienable rights under our Constitution?
  • November 3rd, 2020: Regardless of your viewpoint concerning the machinations and results of November 3rd, 2020, any doubts surrounding the integrity of our election systems should be thoroughly and objectively investigated. What is the problem with investigating irregularities and with auditing results? Try getting a mortgage loan without being ‘audited’ (look what happened when that didn’t happen – the 2007-2008 Financial Crisis with the collapse of mortgage CDOs). Plus, if the Biden regime was installed with 81,000,000 votes and those votes are truly legitimate, what’s the problem with confirming that they are ? Will you, if elected to office, confront this affront to the citizens of our State and our Constitutional Republic and to our inalienable rights under our Constitution?
  • Lawlessness & Disorder: Defund the Police, No Charges-No Bail-No Prosecution, Reduced Sentencing, Stand-Down Orders, Sanctuary Cities, shall we go on? At least 12 16 major U.S. cities have set annual murder records in 2021 (one of those being Tucson), and there are still several weeks remaining in the year! Plus, we are now being told that it’s ‘Safari Rules’! The underlying elements of the ‘Safari Principle’ narrative begin with a pretense that victims of the mob, any mob or individual predator, have no one except themselves to blame because they did not follow the Rules of the Safari – when in the proximity of any person, event or situation that is engaged in an unlawful act supported by the political left, you are not permitted to exit your vehicle or engage in activity that will lead to your targeting. If you enter a perp’s ‘space to destroy’, you are to blame for your own outcome!  The legal system tells us that ‘ignorance of the law is no excuse’, but ignoring the law entirely is OK? Will you, if elected to office, confront this affront to the citizens of our State and our Constitutional Republic and to our inalienable rights under our Constitution?
  • Civil Asset Forfeiture, Red Flag Laws, and other similar measures that negate Due Process: Will you, if elected to office, confront this affront to the citizens of our State and our Constitutional Republic and to our inalienable rights under our Constitution?
  • Constant & Endless Wars: Why must our sons and daughters be sent to or remain in obscure places on this planet where the only ‘threat’ is the threat to the obscured money flows to the pockets of the Uniparty, or the threat to the revenue and profit of the Military Industrial Complex? It’s not the Uniparty’s sons and daughters who will be sacrificed to the perverse appetites of these ruling elites. It will be yours. And, why must our sons and daughters be sacrificed on the altar of sh!tty polls and/or collapsing favorability ratings in a desperate attempt to gain favor with the citizenry (or to obfuscate and deflect from sh!tty policies and an economy in crisis)? The only result to be gained at this juncture is WWIII. Those who fail to learn the lessons of history are doomed to repeat it. Will you, if elected to office, confront this threat and affront to our Constitutional Republic and to our inalienable rights under our Constitution?
  • The Weaponization of the Washington Bureaucracy:  The DOJ, FBI, IRS, et al., have been openly weaponized against the majority party’s political opponents and/or anyone or group who speaks out against the ruling regime. Let’s also not forget that the NSA, CIA and America’s other intelligence agencies have essentially become the Fourth Branch of Government, and are no longer accountable to the American People. Will you, if elected to office, confront this affront to the citizens of our State and our Constitutional Republic and to our inalienable rights under our Constitution?
  • The CCP – the Chinese Communist Party and its influence in our government. Why are the ideology and policies of a Marxist, Communist regime becoming the ideology and policies of an American regime?  Will you confront this affront to our Constitutional Republic and to our inalienable rights under our Constitution?
  • Socialism | Marxism | Communism, i.e., Tyranny and Totalitarianism:The U.S. will never be a Socialist country“. How many times have we heard this? However, the march to Marxism and Totalitarianism continues, essentially unabated. The ways and means to poison and to divide Americans continues, essentially unabated. The advance of Critical Race Theory (CRT), The1619 Project, the antisemitism and anti-Americanism freely spewed by The Squad, et al., the legitimization of Antifa and BLM – both with deep Marxist roots, the vilification,  denigration and revisionism of the history of America along with its symbols; all continue, essentially unabated. Government Mandates that usurp an individual’s control over their own and their own children’s bodies; all continue, essentially unabated. Will you, if elected to office, confront this affront to the citizens of our State and our Constitutional Republic and to our inalienable rights under our Constitution?
  • Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) and The Federal Reserve, with its incessant scope-creep and money-printing. MMT basically posits that government can spend as much money as it wants, and left to its own devices, government will spend as much as it will be allowed to spend. How’s that worked out historically? Will this time be different? Will you, if elected to office, confront this affront to our Constitutional Republic and to our inalienable rights under our Constitution?
  • The American Gulag(s): GITMO is on U.S. Soil. The ruling regime here in America now incarcerates what are, in essence, political prisoners. Will you, if elected to office, confront this affront to our Constitutional Republic and to our inalienable rights under our Constitution? Will you confront what is the unconstitutional January 6 Committee?
  • The Case of Julian Assange: Regardless of your opinion of Julian Assange and WikiLeaks, Assange has essentially been targeted for his contributions to journalism and his case has dangerous implications for the future of journalism and press freedom, not only in these United States, but around the world as well. In addition, the Biden administration is eager to see Assange punished and silenced for life, not out of any national security concerns, but instead due to a thirst for vengeance over the role Assange played in publishing documents during the 2016 election that reflected poorly on Hillary Clinton and the Democratic National Committee. It is difficult at this point to avoid the conclusion that Julian Assange is not only imprisoned for the crime of journalism which exposed serious crimes and lies by the west’s most powerful security state agencies, but that he is also a classic political prisoner. Will you, if elected to office, confront this affront to our Constitutional Republic and to our inalienable rights under our Constitution?
  • The Washington DC Uniparty: It is grossly obvious that there is a singular political outlook that surrounds all of the politicians occupying Washington DC, and that this ‘singular political outlook’  functions only for the politicians occupying Washington DC and not for the American People. Will you, if elected to office, confront this affront to our Constitutional Republic and to our inalienable rights under our Constitution?
  • Pelosi’s Police: In a remarkable display of hubris, Nancy Pelosi placed satellite field offices for the Washington D.C. Capitol Police in key regions around the country. When we step back and count the number of FBI field offices already dispersed over these United States, one might ask: why does the Capitol Hill police need to expand beyond Washington DC? Essentially, what Nancy Pelosi did was to expand the federal law enforcement mechanism of the legislative branch into specific areas where they can investigate political opposition armed with legal authority. According to Politico, Capitol Police investigators are preparing secret dossiers on lawmakers, congressional staff, donors, and even constituents who visit their representatives in public or in private. It appears, also, that the D.C. Capital Police have in fact become Pelosi’s spies. So, what is this, really? What legal authority did Pelosi cite to support this? There is no legislative or Constitutional process for a subsidiary federal law enforcement agency to exist. This appears to be a new construction outside the boundaries of the legislative branch, and quasi-constitutional from the framework of the executive branch. Will you, if elected to office, confront this affront to our Constitutional Republic and to our inalienable rights under our Constitution?
    • Ps. Yahoo News revealed last year that the U.S. Postal Service has been “quietly running a program that tracks and collects Americans’ social media posts, including those about planned protests.” The program has used facial recognition technology and social media monitoring services to surveil individuals, including protesters demonstrating against everything from police brutality to COVID-19 lockdown measures. “The questionable surveillance schemes appear to indicate that the government is weaponizing the nation’s postal service to improperly spy on the citizens who fund it,” said Judicial Watch. “Why would the government depend on the Postal Service to examine the internet for security reasons?”
  • The Great Reset: The United States of America, with its Constitution, stands firmly in the path of Globalists demanding a New World Order  where you will own nothing and be happy. What is being attempted is a Neo Feudalism, where we will all be subjects of the ruling class – not citizens – herded into smart cities with the eliminaton of private property, being totally dependent on the state. Will you, if elected to office, confront this affront to our Constitutional Republic and to our inalienable rights under our Constitution?
  • The United Nations: United to do what? Why do our elected representatives continue to fund an organization that repeatedly demonstrates defective judgement, illegality and corruption, and that continually works to undermine the sovereignty of these United States? The U.S. is the largest source of funds for the U.N., and currently the U.N. is using those funds to provide cash cards to migrants to underwrite their trek up through South America, Central America, and Mexico; essentially underwriting the massive invasion of our Southern border. Why do we fund an organization that hates us? And, why do we fund an organization whose founding charter is the polar opposite of ours? Whereas the U.S. Constitution creates a government with strictly limited and defined powers, the UN Charter establishes the framework for expansive global governance towards one world government. Will you, if elected to office, confront this affront to our Constitutional Republic and to our inalienable rights under our Constitution?
  • The Purge of the U.S. Military: Soon after the installation of the Biden regime, an order was issued by Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin that the U.S. Armed Forces must address “extremism”. The Biden regime is falsely accusing some of the 2+ million service members of harboring “extremists and white supremacists in the ranks”.  This is unprecedented – unless you are a clone of Joseph Stalin – and anyone who is not yet a cadaver knows that this order is solely intended to purge officers and enlisted personnel who might hold conservative views and/or support Donald Trump. Will you, if elected to office, confront this affront to the security of our Constitutional Republic and to our inalienable rights under our Constitution?
  • Citizens United: Get Zucker-bucks, Soros, Bloomberg, and their fellow billionaires, and the dark and special interest money out of our elections!  Remember Citizens United v. Federal Elec­tion Commis­sion? Citizens United v. Federal Elec­tion Commis­sion was a contro­ver­sial decision that reversed century-old campaign finance restric­tions and enabled corpor­a­tions and other outside groups to spend unlim­ited funds on elec­tions. While wealthy donors, corpor­a­tions, and special interest groups have long had an outsized influ­ence in elec­tions, that sway has dramat­ic­ally expan­ded since the Citizens United decision, with negat­ive reper­cus­sions for Amer­ican demo­cracy and the fight against polit­ical corrup­tion. The ruling ushered in massive increases in polit­ical spend­ing from outside groups, dramat­ic­ally expand­ing the already outsized polit­ical influ­ence of wealthy donors, corpor­a­tions, and special interest groups. Polit­ical action commit­tees, or “PACs”, are organ­iz­a­tions that raise and spend money for campaigns that support or oppose polit­ical candid­ates, legis­la­tion, or ballot initi­at­ives. Tradi­tional PACs are permit­ted to donate directly to a candid­ate’s offi­cial campaign, but they were also subject to contri­bu­tion limits, both in terms of what they can receive from indi­vidu­als and what they can give to candid­ates. For example, PACs were only permit­ted to contrib­ute up to $5,000 per year to a candid­ate per elec­tion. In the 2010 case Speech­now.org v. FEC, however, a federal appeals court ruled — apply­ing logic from Citizens United — that outside groups could accept unlim­ited contri­bu­tions from both indi­vidual donors and corpor­a­tions as long as they don’t give directly to candid­ates. Labeled “super PACs”, these outside groups were still permit­ted to spend money on inde­pend­ently produced ads and on other commu­nic­a­tions that promote or attack specific candid­ates. In other words, super PACs are not bound by spend­ing limits on what they can collect or spend. Addi­tion­ally, super PACs are required to disclose their donors, but those donors can include dark money groups, which make the original source of the dona­tions unclear. And while super PACs are tech­nic­ally prohib­ited from coordin­at­ing directly with candid­ates, weak coordin­a­tion rules have often proven inef­fect­ive. Super PAC money star­ted influ­en­cing elec­tions almost imme­di­ately after Citizens United. And, this allowed Big Tech to essentially become Super PACs. Will you, if elected to office, confront this affront to the security of our Constitutional Republic and what is a gross peversion to free and fair elections?
  • 2nd Ammnendmnent: Mr., Mrs., Ms. (or substitute your preferred pronoun) Candidate… What part of ‘Shall Not Be Infringed ‘ don’t you understand?
  • RINOs: Mr., Mrs., Ms. (or substitute your preferred pronoun) Candidate… Are you one? Everything you need to know about RINOs in 30 seconds.