The Arizona Audit Report:
The Arizona Audit Could Not Find the Identity of 86,391 Voters – They Don’t Appear to Exist and 73.8% Are Democrat or No Party Affiliation. This is disclosed on Page 56 of the “Results Details” report.
Other Findings Include:
- Official Canvass has 3,432 more ballots cast than the list of people who show as having cast a vote (VM55).
- 9,041 mail-in voters show returning more ballots (EV33) than they were sent (EV32).
- 277 Precincts show in the Official Canvass as having more ballots cast than people who showed up to vote (VM55) for a total of 1,551 excess votes.
- There are 2,472 ballots shown in EV33 that don’t have corresponding entries in the VM55, and only 2,042 ballots show as rejected in the Official Canvas for a discrepancy of 430.
- 397 mail-in ballots show as received (EV33) that never show as sent (EV32).
- 255,326 Early Votes show in the VM55 that do not have a corresponding EV33 entry.
A canvass was removed from the scope of work as the U.S. DoJ threatened the Senate with criminal action if a canvass was attempted. However, a canvass was done by a grassroots citizens group . They found:
- 173,104 Lost Votes. ‘Lost Votes’ are those votes where prople voted but their votes were discarded.
- 96,389 Ghost Votes. ‘Ghost Votes’ are those votes cast by someone other than the voter assigned to the vote.
- Dead voters accounted for a significant number of these anomalies.
A Thousand Cuts… VIDEO
The people behind the video below are individual American citizens that stepped up to help others hear the voices of our fellow citizens. This is non-partisan, and inclusive of all citizens, regardless of ideology. Every one of their voices matters, and WILL be heard. Our elections are to be decided by US; not big tech, not big media, not big pharma, and not by anyone else, regardless of how much money they have or how long they’ve been in office. We will not be divided any longer.
The audit was designed to be a comprehensive review of the results from the Maricopa County 2020 General Election to confirm the effectiveness of existing legislation in governing elections, and to provide additional insights on possible areas of information-based legislative reform that could ensure an even greater level of integrity and accuracy in how elections are conducted.
The Navarro Reports:
The three volumes of the Navarro Report provide a demonstration that President Trump had a good faith belief that the November 3, 2020 Presidential election results, were, indeed, the poisonous fruit of widespread fraud and election irregularities. Evidence used in the preparation of the Navarro Report includes more than 50 lawsuits and judicial rulings, thousands of affidavits and declarations, testimony in a variety of state venues, published analyses by think tanks and legal centers, videos and photos, public comments, and extensive press coverage.
Volume 1 of the Navarro Report, The Immaculate Deception, assesses the fairness and integrity of the 2020 Presidential Election by identifying and assessing six key dimensions of alleged election irregularities. These irregularities included: outright fraud, ballot mishandling, a wide range of process fouls, multiple violations of the 14th Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause, voting machine irregularities, and statistical anomalies. This assessment was conducted across six key battleground states – Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. It would be the outcomes in these six states that would ultimately be election-determinate.
Volume 2 of the Navarro Report, The Art of the Steal, examines the institutional genesis of the six types of election irregularities. One key finding: The Democrat Party efforts to strategically game the election process across the six battleground states began years before, and in many cases, shortly after President Trump was elected in 2016.
Volume 3, Yes – President Trump Won | Volume III Final Statistical Review, is designed to serve as a capstone to what has been a comprehensive analysis of the question: Was the 2020 presidential election stolen from Donald J. Trump? In this report, we provide the most up-to-date statistical “receipts” with respect to the potential number of illegal votes in each battleground state.
Professor David K. Clements:
Anyone who proposes that there “is no evidence” for massive election fraud in November’s presidential election doesn’t know what they are talking about. David K. Clements, a business law professor at New Mexico State University (NMSU) released a provocative video in response to a letter sent to the entire faculty of NMSU from Dr. John Floros, the university’s president. Clements described the letter as “regurgitating” the narrative “in the media” regarding the election and the January 6 violence at the U.S. Capital. While broadly addressing many issues on these topics, he was very specific with regards to his own personal investigation into the election fraud question.
And there’s more…
And maybe more ?
Edward Solomon’s Evidentiary Paper on Michigan: Here
Edward Soloman’s Evidentiary Paper on Georgia: Here
Edward Solomon’s Evidentiary Paper on Pennsylvania: Here
Edward Soloman’s video: ES&S Transferring Vote Ratios between Precincts in PA
More interesting statistics…
Analyzing American Election Integrity
Noting that some polls show nearly half the country still doesn’t believe Joe Biden won the election, former Republican member of Congress who ran for president, Michele Bachmann, who is now the dean of the graduate school of government at Regent University in Virginia Beach, Virginia put together a seven-hour virtual conference called “Analyzing American Election Integrity.”
If you can make the time, click on the above link to watch.
And , the 81,000,000 voter question is…
IF BIDEN’S ELECTION WAS LEGIT, WHY WON’T DEMOCRATS WELCOME AN AUDIT?
Plus, Pence blew it.
On January 6th, Mike Pence asserted that he did not have the authority under the Constitution to claim, “…unilateral authority to determine which electoral votes should be counted and which should not.” But, that’s not what you were asked to do, Mr. Pence! John C. Eastman, the Founding Director of the Claremont Institute’s Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence, sets the record straight about how Vice President Pence abandoned his responsibility to the American People.